| The Hidden Cost of Increasing Data Storage | Kingdom Data Recovery |
|
|
|
| IT News | |||
| Friday, 02 October 2009 | |||
The Hidden Cost of Increasing Data StorageMass IT environments have the resources to cope with all aspects of a network enlargement, including the initial analysis, equipment installment and cabling, and suitable access management to users. In smaller environments the planning can not go beyond the present reaction to the user’s requirements—that is, “we’re out of space!” Whilst the size of the environment could ascertain how computer storage demands are handled and managed, such things as suitable equipment cooling, computer storage management software that provides scalable outgrowth (SRM), disaster recovery (including backup contingencies), and data recovery fears apply to IT environments of every size. In one scenario, picture a small business with 5 desktop machines. Despite abiding by careful data compression processes and stringent archiving of old data files, their system is running out of space. They have a small-scale file server sitting near the users’ desks. Can the business owner upgrade the file server with a larger hard drive or should he add a separate rack of bargain-priced drives? How much space will they need? Will a terabyte be adequate? What if they need to upgrade later? How difficult will it be? What other concealed costs are they going to encounter?
How can you get the most out of present storage space, not permitting it to fill up so rapidly? In conjunction, how do you prevent your storage space from running out before the full life expectancy is recognised? This is where storage management software, such as SRM and ILM, comes in to play. Storage Resource Management (SRM) software gives storage administrators the correct tools to manage space effectively. Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) software assists the management of data through its lifecycle.
Manufacturers are working hard to optimise the operation of their machines, yet server power consumption stays on the increase. What will be the power demand of your company’s new storage solution? Luiz André Barroso at Google reports that if performance per watt is to stay continual over the following few years, power costs could easily overtake computer hardware costs, perhaps by a heavy margin.
Closely related to power expenditure is the need to keep cool the more powerful C.P.U.s found in the newest computers. Both the performance and life expectancy of the equipment are related to the component temperature of the equipment. Ever since the Pentium II processor in 1997, proper heat dissipation using heat sinks and cooling system fans has become a standard for PC equipment. Today’s superior C.P.U.s, motherboards, graphics cards, and hard disks demand reliable temperature management in order to effectively and efficiently work day in, day out.
With proper heat dissipation and cooling comes noise. All those additional fans and cooling compressors can produce a pronounced amount of dBs. A large IT environment has the luxury of potentially keeping its noisy computers away from the users. Yet, in a smaller-scale business or home business, few have discovered the audio levels generated by their storage kit to be unbearable or at the least concentration breaking. Such noise makes surrounding areas non-conducive to work and productivity, handicapping employee’s ability to merely think. When expanding your data storage, be sure the resulting noise made is permissible. Be sure, too, that noise curtailment endeavors don’t interfere or get the better of heat dissipation or cooling resolutions.
The equipment investment for the expansion may be considerable, but how does this expanded storage tie in to administrative needs? Should management hire a network advisor to appraise user needs, then install, setup, and trial the new kit? Or can the company’s in-house network administrator do the work? A small company runs a risk because although they might not be able to afford to have a professional appraisal and installation, they may learn the hard way with an cut-rate solution - the old adage of “you get what you pay for.”
How does your business presently handle backup cycles and comparable storage requirements? Do you store your backups on-site, or do you have a secure surrogate location at which to stock this treasured information? Natural disasters such as fires and floods, and extreme disasters like Hurricane Katrina are wakeup calls to many resistive to the idea of offsite data storage. Offsite data storage may be as easy as storing backup tapes off site or archiving data with data farms for a monthly space lease fee, or as complex as having a mirrored site housing a direct copy of all your data (effective but costly).
Databases created as a result of daily commercial activities can be staggering (as referenced in the earlier example of one large retail corporation’s generation of a billion rows of sales data daily). This activity can result in huge amounts of data being stored. One way to optimise database performance is by splitting up the database files and storing them in 3 different locations. In this process, data files are stored in one location, transaction files or logs in a 2nd location, and backups in a altogether different location. This not only makes data processing more streamlined but prevents having an “all the eggs in one basket” situation, advantageous when experiencing a process disturbance such as equipment failure.
The old trend was a standalone unit where the processor and storage were one system. Now the trend is to build a separate networked storage system that can be accessed by many users and servers. In general, there are two types of separate storage systems, the storage area network (SAN), and the network attached storage (NAS).
A disaster recovery plan encompasses everything that could happen if there is a system failure due to destruction, natural disaster, fire, theft or equipment failure. Part of a good disaster recovery plan includes a business continuation plan, that is, how to keep the business going and doing business despite the disaster. When planning for a data storage expansion, the disaster recovery plan should be reviewed to make sure the company’s data is accessible in the event of a contingency, and be closely aligned to business continuity planning and efforts.
Data recovery can become a hidden cost if not planned for. Every business continuity plan and disaster plan should include professional data recovery services as part of their overall solution.
|





